Bernard Grimm
Disbarred Defense Attorney

DC Bar No. 378171. Admitted 1984. Disbarred by consent June 17, 2021. Over 200 jury trials. Disclosed privileged attorney-client communications to prosecution.

In re Grimm, No. 21-BG-313 Consent Disbarment

Who Is Bernard Grimm?

Bernard "Bernie" Grimm was one of Washington DC's most prominent criminal defense attorneys. Admitted to the DC Bar in 1984, he tried over 200 jury trials, including the high-profile acquittal in the Robert Wone murder conspiracy case (2010). He was a frequent legal commentator on Fox News, CNN, and Court TV.

Grimm was a shareholder at Cozen O'Connor (2007–2012) before establishing his own practice, the Law Office of Bernard Grimm. He held himself out as one of the most experienced trial lawyers in the District.

Behind this public persona, however, his office was in crisis. His employee Katherine Ross embezzled approximately $725,000 from client trust accounts between 2016 and 2020 through forged checks. Grimm's failure to maintain proper records allowed this theft to go undetected for four years.

"I had intended to leave the legal profession two years ago... I had never encountered the disciplinary board before."

— Bernard Grimm, as quoted by Reuters
200+
Jury Trials
$725K
Client Funds Embezzled
2021
Year Disbarred

Disbarment Timeline

The path from embezzlement to disbarment. Use the scrubber to filter by year.

2016 2020 2021 2022
Showing 8 of 8 events
2016–2020
Katherine Ross Embezzlement
Employee Katherine Ross embezzles ~$725,000 from Grimm's client trust accounts via forged checks over a four-year period.
Financial
March 2020
PNC Bank Reports Bounced Check
PNC Bank reports a bounced check from Grimm's client trust account, triggering a DC Bar disciplinary investigation. Three disciplinary dockets opened: D091-20, D092-20, D149-20.
Financial
April 2021
Ross Pleads Guilty
Katherine Ross pleads guilty to bank fraud. She is later sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and ordered to pay $320,000 in restitution.
Legal
May 7, 2021
Grimm Signs Consent Disbarment
Grimm signs an affidavit consenting to his own disbarment, acknowledging he cannot successfully defend against the charges of failure to maintain records, commingling and misappropriation of client funds, and charging excessive fees.
Disciplinary
May 11, 2021
Board Recommends Acceptance
The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends acceptance of Grimm's consent disbarment (Board Docket No. 21-BD-023).
Disciplinary
June 17, 2021
DC Court of Appeals Orders Disbarment
The DC Court of Appeals issues the order in In re Grimm, No. 21-BG-313, disbarring Grimm effective September 1, 2021 to allow time to wind down his practice.
Disciplinary
August 17, 2021
Maryland Reciprocal Disbarment
The state of Maryland issues a reciprocal disbarment order effective September 1, 2021.
Disciplinary
April 11, 2022
Grimm Sues PNC Bank
Grimm files Grimm v. PNC Bank NA, No. 1:22-cv-01006 (D.D.C.), alleging the bank's negligence allowed the embezzlement.
Legal

Betrayal of Attorney-Client Privilege

Disclosure to Prosecution

In the Keerikkattil case, Bernard Grimm disclosed privileged attorney-client communications directly to AUSA John Giovannelli. This communication — admitted as Government Exhibit 8 at trial — became a centerpiece of the prosecution's case.

The trial court found that the crime-fraud exception did not apply to this privileged communication. Despite this ruling, the prosecution was allowed to use the communication at trial under a contested waiver theory — a theory that the defense argues was itself the product of the government's own prior improper disclosure.

Grimm's actions effectively made him a "silent witness" for the prosecution while nominally serving as defense counsel. This constitutes a per se Sixth Amendment violation under Shillinger v. Haworth, 70 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 1995), where prejudice is presumed when counsel colludes with the government.

"On consideration of the affidavit of Bernard Grimm, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of this Court... it is ORDERED that Bernard Grimm be, and he hereby is, disbarred."

— DC Court of Appeals, In re Grimm, No. 21-BG-313 (June 17, 2021)
Disciplinary Violations Found: Failure to maintain proper records, commingling and misappropriation of client funds, charging excessive fees, violation of DC Bar Rule on safekeeping client property.

Grimm in the Press

Reuters
"I had intended to leave the legal profession two years ago... I had never encountered the disciplinary board before." Grimm consented to disbarment after disciplinary charges.
ABA Journal
Grimm filed suit against PNC Bank alleging negligence in failing to detect forged checks. The bank fraud totaled approximately $725,000 from client trust accounts.
Key Insight

Grimm's disbarment was widely covered by national legal media. Reuters confirmed his statement about intending to leave the profession. The ABA Journal documented his subsequent lawsuit against PNC Bank. Neither publication noted the breach of attorney-client privilege in the Keerikkattil case — a fact documented only in the appellate brief.

The Numbers Behind the Disbarment

$725K
Client Funds Embezzled
By Katherine Ross, 2016–2020
4 yrs
Theft Undetected
Failed to maintain records
200+
Jury Trials
Over 37 years at the DC Bar
3
Networks Featured
Fox News, CNN, Court TV
Jun 2021
Consent Disbarment
In re Grimm, No. 21-BG-313
5
Disciplinary Violations
Records, commingling, fees, trust, disclosure

Source: DC Bar Disciplinary Records | Appellant's Brief

Bernard Grimm: At a Glance

Related Documents